US v. Skrmetti: Oral Arguments December 4th, 2024 on Tennessee’s ban on youth care

Oral arguments in US v. Skrmetti will occur on Wednesday, December 4, 2024. We at QueerDoc will be watching the hearing.

US v. Skrmetti

US v. Skrmetti is the lawsuit on Tennessee’s discriminatory ban on safe medical care for transgender youth. The legal question at the center of the suit is whether a state banning medical care for transgender youth is discriminatory and unconstitutional. The Tennessee law bans specific medical care for transgender youth, but not for cis youth. This sure looks discriminatory to us.

The question in front of the court is if Tennessee’s ban on medical care for transgender youth that is allowed for cis youth is a form of sex discrimination, which is unconstitutional according to the 14th amendment to the US Constitution. The plaintiffs (the Biden administration, represented by Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar and the ACLU, represented by Chase Strangio) will argue that it is. The defendant, the State of Tennessee, represented by Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti, will argue that sex discrimination is not at play. There have been legal decisions that discrimination on the basis of gender is a form of sex discrimination to support the plaintiff’s argument.

We’re not lawyers, but we know some awesome folks doing fantastic coverage of this case. We’re reading and following them now, and we will continue to do so in the coming months. We’ll also continue to report on legislative happenings and court cases in the states that we serve in. You can keep up with posts via our Blog Index.

The Supreme Court might not announce their decision in this case until June, 2025, so we may be in for a long wait. However, the implications of how SCOTUS decides are pretty intense and could affect care across the country for transgender and cis people alike.

For background information on US v. Skrmetti:

Articles and Essays:

Podcasts and Videos:

We are also expecting reporting from Erin Reed and Assigned Media.

“The United States v. Skrmetti case is focused on whether Tennessee’s gender-affirming care ban violates the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex. The state insists that its ban has nothing to do with sex and that it does not target trans people. Instead, the law “sets age and use-based limits,” Tennessee’s attorney general argues. Minors can still access hormones and puberty blockers for medical purposes, as long as those treatments are not being used as part of a gender transition or to alleviate gender dysphoria. The state claims such a distinction is not based on sex because ‘neither boys nor girls can use these drugs for gender transition.'”

19thnews.org

Screenshots of excerpts from multiple court decisions stating that bans on medical care for transgender youth are discriminatory and unconstitutional.  Text in large all caps white lettering reads "bans are unconstitutional". | Skrmetti SCOTUS

Information and Citations in Support of Adolescent Gender Care


Check-In With QueerDoc!

(Sign up to get an email from us every month or so. We’ll never share your info.)


*** Disclaimer

Any of these articles are for entertainment, informational, and general educational purposes only and should not be considered to be healthcare advice or medical diagnosis, treatment or prescribing. The Content is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical care. Always seek the advice of your qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read on this website.

Share This Post

More To Explore

Request a free 15-minute introductory
appointment to find out more!